Melbourne’s transport plans should be based on fact, not ideology.
—Wayne Kayler-Thompson, VECCI Chief Executive, 2008
For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.
—H.L. Mencken (1880-1956)
There seems to be a lot of disinformation being put out about transport here in Melbourne.
—Professor Vukan Vuchic, on a visit to Melbourne, 1994
Myths About Public Transport
“People Won’t Use It”
- ‘Real’ people don’t use public transport
- People who own cars won’t use public transport
- No-one uses public transport, so it’s pointless trying to improve it
- Public transport can’t be improved until there’s demand for it
- The system is fine: people just have to change their behaviour
- Women’s needs are too flexible and diverse for public transport
- Public transport isn’t viable in Melbourne because it doesn’t snow here
“It Won’t Work”
- Public transport can’t work unless it runs from door to door
- Fixed rail lines are too inflexible for today’s planning needs
- Viable public transport requires high population densities
- Melbourne’s outer suburbs aren’t suited to public transport use
- Public transport only works for trips to the city centre
- Public transport is a subsidy to rich city workers
- Train lines to the suburbs are pointless, as most travel is local
- Public transport doesn’t help with traffic congestion
- You can’t take six kids and 10kg of rice on public transport, so it’s pointless
- ‘100% renewable’ power supply for trains and trams isn’t actually renewable
- Getting people on public transport is a distraction from climate action priorities
- Trams have more greenhouse emissions than cars
- Trams are inflexible and hold up traffic, and should be replaced with buses
- Trams cause more casualty crashes on streets where they run
- Public transport doesn’t really save energy
- Public transport can’t possibly be as fast as driving
- Public transport is obsolete, and progress demands we abandon it
“We Can’t Afford It”
- Public transport is expensive to run
- Public transport is a failure because it requires public subsidies
- On-demand minivans are cheaper to operate than timetabled bus services
- Public transport is a subsidy from poor suburbanites to rich central-city workers
- More money is spent on public transport than on roads
- We’d have to spend heaps of money on infrastructure
- We can’t have Doncaster trains because there’s no room for them
- We can’t have Rowville trains because there’s no room for them
- Public transport is too expensive compared with roads
- We can’t improve public transport because we need the money for hospitals
- Public transport makes housing unaffordable
- Bringing back tram conductors and station staff would send fares through the roof
- Heavy rail costs too much; we should build light rail instead
- We can’t have airport trains because the Citylink contract forbids it
Misreading What People Want
- Park-and-Ride facilities will encourage public transport use
- Making public transport free will encourage use
- People just want faster and more punctual services; they don’t care about frequency
- ‘Super expresses’ will encourage more public transport use
- Trains and trams are obsolete and should be replaced with Maglev / Light Rail / Monorails / Trolley Buses / Trackless Trams / this year’s trendy technology
- Self-driving cars will make public transport obsolete
- Uber-style minivans are a better deal for passengers than timetabled buses
- Light rail is an effective, inexpensive alternative to new train lines
- Tram passengers benefit from fewer tram stops
- Trams will function better if stops are relocated to mid-block locations
- The purpose of tram priority is to stop trams running late
- If people have to transfer, they won’t make the trip
- Smartcards encourage public transport use and reduce fare evasion
- Periodical tickets are inflexible; per-trip fares are better for users
- Multimodal zone-based fares are unfair; we should be charged by distance
- Melbourne’s fares are comparatively cheap
Myths About Cars
Cars and People
Cars and the Environment
- Cars are becoming more fuel efficient
- If we just electrify cars, we don’t need to do anything else to solve climate change
- Planting 17 trees per year will cancel out your car’s environmental impact
- It’s just as effective to promote carpooling as to provide public transport
- Cars are more efficient than public transport because they never run empty
- Alternative fuels will come to the rescue
- Freeways reduce pollution
- Cars have lower greenhouse emissions than trams
- Cars aren’t the biggest greenhouse polluters, so there’s no point focussing on them
The Cost of Cars
- Motorists pay more in taxes and fees than is spent on roads
- The only solution to high petrol prices is to cut fuel tax
- Subsidising car use promotes social equity
- Roads cost the government less than public transport
- Small cars are unsafe and should be avoided
- Electric cars are taxed more, so shouldn’t be charged to use roads
Myths About Freeways
Wrong Ideas About Traffic
- Freeways relieve traffic congestion
- Freeways reduce pollution
- A continuous freeway network will eliminate bottlenecks
- The purpose of freeways is to bypass congested areas
- Freeways are needed for cross-suburban travel
- There’s only one river crossing from Melbourne’s West
- They’re not just freeways, they’re Integrated Transport Corridors
- Roads and public transport complement each other – they don’t compete
- We need big roads anyway, even for sustainable transport
Wrong Ideas About Economics
- Freeways are for freight, not commuters
- More freeways will promote economic growth
- Freeways are cheap
- The objective of transport planning is providing more mobility

